How these figures are derived
This page is the reason to trust anything else on the site. Every default figure in every calculator is listed below with the source it came from and the date it was checked. If a number is not on this page, it should not be on the site.
The model is also validated against an independent benchmark, and that check runs automatically every time the site is rebuilt.
Validation against Sustainability Victoria
Anyone can publish a calculator. The question is whether its output is right, and almost nothing in this market gives a reader any way to check.
Sustainability Victoria publishes measured annual running costs for a Melbourne household — for water heating, for space heating and for cooling. It is the closest thing to an independent benchmark in Australia. The constants in both our models were fitted to reproduce it, across twenty-two separate published figures, and almost all of them land within two per cent.
Water heating
| System | Sustainability Victoria | This model | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electric storage, peak tariff | $1,015 | $1,032 | +1.7% |
| Heat pump, peak tariff | $435 | $427 | −1.7% |
| Gas storage | $780 | $777 | −0.4% |
| Gas instantaneous | $655 | $659 | +0.6% |
Four-person household, 150 litres a day, Melbourne, at the mid-2024 Victorian energy prices that Sustainability Victoria used. Two further checks are price-independent — the ratio of electric storage to heat pump, and of gas storage to gas instantaneous — because a ratio between two systems on the same fuel does not depend on what that fuel costs.
Space heating and cooling
Sixteen more published figures, across three house sizes and every common system. Fifteen land within two per cent. The exception is their own 100 m² multi-split row, which is not on the same line as their 160 m² and 220 m² rows — those two work out at .77 per square metre and the 100 m² one at .13, so no straight-line model can match all three. We match the two that agree with each other and carry a wider tolerance on the third rather than bending the model to fit one point.
| Case | Sustainability Victoria | This model | Residual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multi-split heating, 160 m² | 23 | 23 | 0.0% |
| Multi-split heating, 220 m² | ,269 | ,269 | 0.0% |
| Ducted reverse cycle heating, 160 m² | ,318 | ,313 | −0.3% |
| Ducted gas heating, 220 m² | ,036 | ,034 | −0.1% |
| Multi-split cooling, 160 m² | 0 | 0 | −0.3% |
| Ducted refrigerated cooling, 160 m² | 25 | 26 | +0.6% |
| Ducted evaporative cooling, 160 m² | 0 | 0 | +0.6% |
| Ceiling fans, 160 m² | 0 | 0 | +0.9% |
A selection; the build runs all sixteen. Melbourne, average pre-2005 house, at the prices Sustainability Victoria states on their own pages.
The comparison is not a claim we made once. It runs as a build step
(tools/build/check-model.js) every time the site is rebuilt, and the
build fails if any residual drifts past five per cent. A future quarterly edit to
an efficiency or a standby loss cannot quietly break the agreement this page
asserts.
The heating and cooling calculation
Space conditioning is harder to model than hot water, because the load depends on the building rather than on a fixed volume of water. The method is deliberately simple enough to state in full and check.
How much the house needs
An average pre-2005 Melbourne house needs about 63.2 kWh of delivered heat per square metre per year and 7.3 kWh of cooling. Both fall out of the benchmark fit, and everything else scales off them.
That ratio is the most surprising thing in this module: in Melbourne, heating is nearly nine times cooling for the same house and the same hardware.
Climate
Scaled by heating and cooling degree days on a base of 18 °C, derived from the same Bureau of Meteorology monthly mean temperatures the hot water calculator uses for inlet temperature — so the two modules can never disagree about the weather. Melbourne has 1,239 heating degree days and 173 cooling; Darwin has none and 3,508.
Cooling is scaled by the degree-day ratio raised to the power of 0.8 rather than linearly. A tropical climate needs latent as well as sensible cooling and the raw ratio overstates the difference; the exponent reproduces Sustainability Victoria's own warm-climate multiplier of about 6 within a few per cent.
Building fabric
Sustainability Victoria's own multipliers against a pre-2005 house: a 5-star home needs 40% of the heating energy and 75% of the cooling; a 6-star home 30% and 60%. Insulation helps heating far more than cooling, so a single "efficiency" figure for both is always wrong about one of them.
| House | Heating energy | Cooling energy | Heating a year | Cooling a year | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Built before 2005, or no insulation upgrade | 100% | 100% | $521 | $468 | $988 |
| 5 star — built roughly 2006 to 2011 | 40% | 75% | $208 | $351 | $559 |
| 6 star — built 2012 or later | 30% | 60% | $156 | $281 | $437 |
| 7 star — built to the 2023 code, or deeply retrofitted | 22% | 50% | $115 | $234 | $348 |
The same 160 m² house and the same ducted reverse cycle system in New South Wales, built to four different standards. Insulation cuts heating energy to under a third and cooling energy only to about 60% — they are not the same problem, and a single “efficiency” figure for both is wrong about one of them. No system on the market saves as much as the building fabric does.
What the system actually conditions
A ducted system delivers 1.29 times as much conditioned energy as a multi-split in the same house; a single split about half. One factor covers both duct losses and the fact that ducted conditions the whole house while a split conditions a room.
Modelling those as two separate multipliers double-counts. An earlier version of this calculator did exactly that and came out 25% under the benchmark on every multi-split row while matching ducted perfectly, which is how the error surfaced. The 1.29 was derived independently from the heating table and the cooling table and came out the same both times.
System efficiency
Coefficient of performance for heating and energy efficiency ratio for cooling, from the star rating on the label: 2.30 at one star rising to 5.30 at six. A resistive electric heater is exactly 1.0 and cannot be otherwise. Ducted gas is modelled at 78% delivered, not the 86% on the compliance plate — the plate figure is measured at the burner and 78% is what the benchmark implies once the ducts are counted.
What this does not model
- Zoning. A zoned ducted system used properly behaves partway between the ducted and multi-split rows. Nothing here models how disciplined a household is about closing vents.
- Orientation, shading and glazing. These move cooling load substantially and are not captured by floor area and star rating alone.
- Humidity, except through the cooling exponent. Latent load is approximated, not calculated.
The hot water calculation
Heat required
Raising water from the inlet temperature to the stored temperature takes a fixed amount of energy, and one litre of water is taken as one kilogram:
Q (kJ) = litres × 4.186 kJ/kg·°C × (60 °C − inlet temperature)
Q (kWh) = Q (kJ) ÷ 3,600
This is integrated month by month rather than annually, because the water entering a house is several degrees colder in July than in January. Averaging that away costs a few per cent of accuracy in the southern states.
Why 60 degrees
Below about 60 °C, Legionella bacteria can multiply in a storage tank. Australian plumbing standards require storage at 60 °C with a tempering valve limiting the temperature at the tap to 50 °C. It is a health requirement rather than a comfort setting, which is why the calculator does not offer it as an adjustable input on storage systems.
Daily hot water demand
50 litres a day for one person, 90 for two, 120 for three, 150 for four and 180 for five or more, at 60 °C. These are Sustainability Victoria's figures, used here so that our output stays comparable with theirs. The calculator lets you override the litres directly.
System efficiencies
These are fitted to the benchmark above rather than taken from manufacturer literature.
| System | Efficiency | Standing loss |
|---|---|---|
| Electric storage | 95% at the element | 1.5 kWh/day |
| Gas storage | 75% | 8 MJ/day |
| Gas instantaneous | 87% | none, plus 60 kWh/year of electricity for the fan and electronics |
| LPG storage and instantaneous | as their natural gas equivalents | as above |
| Heat pump | see below | 0.5 kWh/day |
| Solar thermal | booster as its fuel's equivalent | 1.8 kWh/day, electric boost |
Heat pump coefficient of performance
This is where the model differs most from the rest of the market, so it is worth setting out fully.
The nameplate COP is multiplied by two factors. The first is a temperature adjustment applied month by month against each capital's mean air temperature, running from 0.65 at 0 °C to 1.12 at 35 °C. The second is a flat in-service derating of 0.74, covering compressor cycling, standing losses in the pipework, control deadbands and the difference between a steady laboratory draw and a household taking four showers in an hour.
That derating is not an assumption we chose. It is the value that makes the model agree with Sustainability Victoria's measured Melbourne figure, and it produces an effective annual COP of about 2.2 in Melbourne against a nameplate of 3.2. A calculator that uses the nameplate figure understates heat pump running costs by roughly a third.
| City | Mean air temperature | Nameplate COP | Effective annual COP | Shortfall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darwin, NT | 27.6 °C | 3.2 | 2.55 | 20% below nameplate |
| Brisbane, QLD | 20.8 °C | 3.2 | 2.39 | 25% below nameplate |
| Perth, WA | 18.9 °C | 3.2 | 2.34 | 27% below nameplate |
| Sydney, NSW | 18.6 °C | 3.2 | 2.33 | 27% below nameplate |
| Adelaide, SA | 17.4 °C | 3.2 | 2.29 | 29% below nameplate |
| Melbourne, VIC | 15.1 °C | 3.2 | 2.22 | 31% below nameplate |
| Hobart, TAS | 13.1 °C | 3.2 | 2.14 | 33% below nameplate |
| Canberra, ACT | 13.6 °C | 3.2 | 2.14 | 33% below nameplate |
A heat pump moves heat out of the air, so it works less well when the air is cold — and the laboratory test that produces the nameplate figure does not see compressor cycling, standing losses or a household drawing four showers in an hour. These figures are calibrated against Sustainability Victoria's measured Melbourne running costs. A heat pump is still the cheapest electric option everywhere in Australia; it is simply not three and a half times as good as an element.
Solar thermal fraction
The share of the annual load a correctly sized collector supplies before boosting: Darwin 82%, Brisbane 75%, Perth 72%, Sydney 70%, Adelaide 68%, Melbourne 62%, Canberra 60%, Hobart 55%. Derived from each city's STC zone and annual mean temperature and cross-checked against the 45–80% range in the literature.
The gas daily supply charge
Hot water carries a share of the gas connection charge depending on what else the household uses gas for: 100% where hot water is the only gas appliance, 50% where gas is also used for cooking or for heating, and 34% where it is used for both.
This single term moves the answer by up to $300 a year and reverses the ranking between a heat pump and gas instantaneous in most states. It is the most commonly omitted term in every competing calculator we examined.
Solar self-consumption
Where a household has rooftop solar, a heat pump is assumed to be timed so that 70% of its run falls in daylight. That electricity is not free and is not charged at the retail rate: it costs the export credit given up, taken as 4c per kilowatt hour. Feed-in tariffs are deregulated across most of Australia in 2026 and sit near 3 to 5 cents.
Total cost of ownership
The ten and twenty year views add the installed cost, subtract rebates at the bottom of their published range, and add a replacement where the system will not survive the horizon. No energy price inflation is applied by default: compounding a guess about future prices makes a calculator look precise rather than making it accurate.
Cold water inlet temperature
AS/NZS 4234 is the Australian standard for water heater modelling and carries the authoritative inlet temperature series. It is paywalled, so it cannot be reproduced here. Rather than quote figures we cannot show you the derivation of, the site uses a stated physical assumption you can check:
Buried mains equilibrate toward soil temperature at depth, which tracks the annual mean air temperature. Inlet temperature is therefore set to each city's long-term annual mean from Bureau of Meteorology climate averages, with monthly variation damped to 40% of the air temperature swing and lagged one month.
That puts Melbourne's inlet between 13.0 °C and 17.2 °C through the year, with an annual mean of 15.1 °C, and Darwin's between 26.5 °C and 28.3 °C. Inlet temperature is a user-overridable input in the calculator's advanced settings, and the fact that the model reproduces Sustainability Victoria's Melbourne figures is itself evidence that the assumption is close enough.
Energy prices
Government reference rates effective 1 July 2026. These are what a household on a standing or default offer pays; market offers from retailers are frequently below them, which is why every rate on this site can be overwritten with your own.
| State or territory | Standard rate | Controlled load | Daily supply | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | 33.1c/kWh | 19.3c/kWh | $1.66/day | Ausgrid distribution zone |
| Victoria | 27.5c/kWh | 21.4c/kWh | $1.27/day | Jemena distribution zone |
| Queensland | 28.0c/kWh | 16.4c/kWh | $1.92/day | Energex, south-east Queensland |
| South Australia | 41.9c/kWh | 22.2c/kWh | $1.80/day | SA Power Networks, whole of state |
| Western Australia | 33.3c/kWh | none available | $1.19/day | Synergy Home Plan A1 |
| Tasmania | 28.0c/kWh | 21.1c/kWh | $1.68/day | Aurora Energy Tariff 31, controlled load on Tariff 41 |
| Australian Capital Territory | 37.0c/kWh | 27.8c/kWh | $1.34/day | ActewAGL standing offer |
| Northern Territory | 31.7c/kWh | none available | $0.63/day | Jacana Energy standard residential |
Government reference rates effective 1 July 2026. Market offers from retailers are often below them. Western Australia and the Northern Territory have no residential controlled load tariff at all, which removes the cheapest way to run an electric storage tank in those two markets.
The determinations behind each row are the AER Default Market Offer 2026–27 for New South Wales, south-east Queensland and South Australia; the ESC Victorian Default Offer 2026–27; the WA Government Standard Electricity Prices 2026–27; the OTTER-approved Aurora Energy standing offer for Tasmania; the ICRC retail price recalibration for the ACT; and the NT Electricity Pricing Order.
Gas
| State or territory | Usage rate | Daily supply | Availability |
|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | 2.72c/MJ | $0.88/day | Widely available |
| Victoria | 2.58c/MJ | $0.84/day | Widely available |
| Queensland | 2.45c/MJ | $0.80/day | Widely available |
| South Australia | 3.05c/MJ | $0.96/day | Widely available |
| Western Australia | 5.29c/MJ | $0.28/day | Widely available |
| Tasmania | 3.05c/MJ | $0.96/day | Reaches very few homes |
| Australian Capital Territory | 2.72c/MJ | $0.88/day | Widely available |
| Northern Territory | no reticulated gas | — | Bottled LPG only |
Western Australia is the outlier and it is worth understanding: its regulated tariff charges roughly double the eastern states per megajoule but only about a third as much per day to stay connected. Light gas users do well there and heavy ones badly.
Residential gas retail is deregulated in New South Wales, Victoria, Queensland and South Australia, so there is no determination to quote. Those figures are mid-2026 retail market averages, cross-checked against the published rates of the three largest retailers. Western Australia's is the regulated maximum set by Energy Policy WA. Tasmania's and the ACT's are proxies, and are labelled as such in the table.
LPG is taken at $167 per 45 kg bottle holding 2,172 MJ, which is about 7.6 cents a megajoule — the dearest common fuel for water heating in Australia by a wide margin.
Emissions
Scope 2 electricity emission factors and fuel combustion factors are taken from the National Greenhouse Accounts Factors 2025, published by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, which apply to the 2025–26 reporting year.
| Jurisdiction | kg CO₂e per kWh |
|---|---|
| Tasmania | 0.20 |
| South Australia | 0.22 |
| Western Australia (SWIS) | 0.50 |
| Northern Territory | 0.56 |
| New South Wales and the ACT | 0.64 |
| Queensland | 0.67 |
| Victoria | 0.78 |
Natural gas distributed in a pipeline is 51.53 kg CO₂e per gigajoule (0.05153 kg/MJ); LPG is 60.6 kg CO₂e per gigajoule.
One consequence is worth stating because it is uncomfortable and because a site that hid it would not be worth reading: on today's grid, a gas instantaneous water heater produces fewer emissions than a heat pump everywhere in Australia except South Australia and Tasmania. That reverses as the grid decarbonises, and it does not apply at all to a heat pump running on the household's own solar — but it is true now, and the gas versus electric guide sets out the numbers.
Rebates
Every rebate is shown as a separate line item with the administering body named and linked, and never folded into a headline price. In the total cost of ownership figures they are counted at the bottom of their published range.
| State or territory | Federal STCs | State scheme | State value |
|---|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | $800–$1,200 | Hot water upgrade incentive | $330–$640 |
| Victoria | $800–$1,200 | Solar Homes hot water rebate Victorian Energy Upgrades (VEU) | $1,000–$1,400 $400–$1,200 |
| Queensland | $800–$1,200 | no state scheme | — |
| South Australia | $800–$1,200 | Retailer Energy Productivity Scheme (REPS) | $300–$600 |
| Western Australia | $800–$1,200 | no state scheme | — |
| Tasmania | $800–$1,200 | no state scheme | — |
| Australian Capital Territory | $800–$1,200 | Sustainable Household Scheme and ActewAGL water heater upgrade | interest-free loan |
| Northern Territory | $800–$1,200 | no state scheme | — |
Only Victoria, New South Wales, South Australia and the ACT run a hot water scheme of their own. Everywhere else the federal certificates are the whole story, and saying so plainly is more use than pretending otherwise. Every figure is indicative — the real number comes from an accredited installer's quote. Last verified 5 September 2026.
Rebate values are indicative. The figure that counts is the one on an accredited installer's quote, and the schemes change without much notice — Victoria's income test arrived on 1 July 2026 and the New South Wales co-payment rule changed in September 2025. Every entry carries its own verification date.
Appliances
Duty-cycled appliances — refrigeration, spas — carry measured annual consumption figures from the Energy Rating (GEMS) scheme, and the calculator does not offer an hours-per-day input for them, because substituting a guess for a measurement makes the answer worse rather than more personal.
Directly switched appliances are modelled as rated power × hours a day × days a year. The days-a-year term matters: a fan heater at five hours a day over a 120-day heating season costs about a third of what the same figure spread across 365 days would suggest, and published appliance figures routinely make that error.
Appliance figures are typical values for a mid-range current model and are adjustable throughout. The daily supply charge is excluded from individual appliance costs, because it does not change with what you plug in.
What we do not model
Stating the limits is part of the method.
- Time-of-use tariffs in detail. The calculator handles a flat rate and a controlled load rate. A household on a three-band time-of-use plan can enter their own effective average rate, but the tool does not shift load between bands.
- The interaction between heating appliances and the house. A fridge dumps heat into your kitchen and a heater's output partly offsets other heating. Both effects are real and small; modelling them precisely would be false precision.
- Water usage cost. The figures are for energy only. The water itself is charged separately and does not vary with which system heats it.
- Installation edge cases. Installed cost ranges assume a like-for-like replacement in an accessible location. Running a new circuit, relocating a unit or upgrading a switchboard is extra and is not in the ranges.
- Your actual behaviour. Every figure assumes typical usage. The single largest source of error in any of these numbers is the household, not the model.
Update schedule
Energy prices are reviewed quarterly and after every regulatory reset — the next significant one is the 1 July determination cycle. Rebate schemes are reviewed quarterly. System specifications, climate data and emission factors are reviewed annually, or immediately if a new National Greenhouse Accounts Factors edition is published.
The current figures were verified on 5 September 2026. If you are reading this well after that date and a number matters to your decision, follow the source link and check it — that is what the links are there for.
Found something wrong? Tell us. Corrections are the most useful thing anyone sends us.